How relevant is a local number’s prefix?

There is quite often some degree of confusion when it comes to choosing a local number and it is mostly caused by the prefix. If you’re not sure what the prefix is, it’s the first few digits after the area code.

I was talking to a customer a few days ago and they told me they were looking for a Bradford number beginning 01274 8XX XXX. I had a look at our available 01274 numbers and found they all began 01274 456 XXX. The customer was disappointed that we couldn’t offer the right number for her area.

Well, that’s not very good of you…

But this is where the confusion begins. The prefix has absolutely no bearing on the relevance of the local number. The only thing that matters is the area code itself, which for Bradford is 01274.

Each telecoms provider is given a different prefix for each area code. So in this case, all our Bradford numbers have the prefix of ’456′. The customer’s understanding of what a Bradford number is most likely based on BT’s range of numbers, which have the prefix starting ’8′.

But as providers such as Sky and Virgin Media gain more prominence in providing landlines, you’ll start to see more and more prefixes in your local area.

So what difference does the prefix make?

None whatsoever. The most common confusion we find regarding prefixes, come with London numbers. Historically, 0207 is associated with inner London, whereas 0208 is associated with outer London. People actually get even more confused when we talk about the new 0203 range – what part of London is this associated with?

London. Not any particular part of London either. The fact is, the area code for London is actually just 020, so all three number ranges are the same. People believe that they represent different areas because this is where BT originally chose to place them.

You may start to notice different prefixes in your local area. My current home phone number begins 01245 63, however the last two houses I’ve lived in began 01245 47. Ok, so I now live in a different part of town, but the real difference in the prefix is based on provider – ’63′ is a Sky range, whereas ’47′ is a BT range. A friend of mine who lives about 20 houses away from me down the same road, has a Virgin Media number which begins ’60′.

On my way to work each morning, I walk past a little parade of businesses such as cafes, estate agencies and hairdressers. I don’t normally pay much attention to them, but as I walked past this morning, I noticed something for the first time – they all use local numbers, but they all had completely different prefixes.

So which business had the right local number? The answer: all of them

Share this post

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail


2 comments on “How relevant is a local number’s prefix?”

  1. Interesting topic. Historically when it was the GPO then BT that only held the numbers I remember numbers that were only four digits long, with a local area code. Our family numbers over time had to become the standard six digits, some were already five, so those individual house phones became five then six digits long as they are now (in general ‘code-******’), with the Brighton code 0273 then 01273 from 1995, now using the full code too even from inside the area. I can still remember my Nan picking up her phone and saying that four digit number she had in Shoreham! Hers became 46****
    I kept all the BT phone Companions over the years which explained who the new operators were who started coming along with the different 2 digit prefix after the area code. Nynex had 027370. Where we live now, the ‘old’ BT exchange is too far away to get decent broadband on copper cables, so the 2-digit prefixes still have some relevance to the former BT exchanges even today, hence our Ntl/Virgin cable broadband initially gave us a 0127370**** number, although we just use mobiles now.
    From the 01245 numbers mentioned in the article above, the companion in 1995 shows BT numbers like the 47, with only MCL with 70 being Mercury. In 1995 London became 0171. As I started off saying, an interesting topic once you look into it.

Comment on this blog post

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *